Quotes from Joshua Lederberg

I'd like to put in a vote for the intrinsic fascination of science.

We are all very individual. You have to find out what you can do best, and be self-conscious about that.

I have many shortcomings. I feel very lucky to have been able to have what I've had.

A Swedish newspaper reporter called and said, You've been awarded the Prize. I was quite sure it was a practical joke.

I started on the use of the Internet for scientific communication. Our research group was one of the very first to make really systematic use of it as a way of managing research projects.

I was reading five or six years ahead of my grade during public school. I was pretty bored. I made a contract with some of my teachers that if I didn't ask too many questions, I could work in the back of the room.

I did get a very fine education, and not just in science. It took some pressure on the part of my elders to convince me that I really should take an interest in humanities.

I hope I've lived a life of science whose style will encourage younger people.

I was making a lot of momentous personal decisions. I was still very very young: when the prize was awarded, I was 33; the work I had done when I was 21.

If we have isolated individuals able to inflict enormous harm, imagine what a single lunatic can do with a nuclear weapon. I think the whole base of civil society is at risk.

Try hard to find out what you're good at and what your passions are, and where the two converge, and build your life around that.

I get curious about new things. My real strength is going into a field that has not been investigated before, and finding new approaches to it.

I think we have to believe we are here for some purpose, and I know there are many cynics who will deny it, but they don't live as if they deny it.

I don't believe anybody can really grasp everything that's even in one textbook.

All of civility depends on being able to contain the rage of individuals.

I wish I had a talent for dropping things as well as taking on new ones. It gets to be quite a clutter after a while.

So many of the things I've predicted were technologies that were just sitting right in front of us.

By the time I was 12 or 13, I was studying biochemistry textbooks.

If you want to solve very complex problems, you will have to end up letting machines work out a lot of the details for themselves, and in ways that we don't understand what they are doing.

My ambitions were already very clearly fixed by the time I was 6 or 7.

To have the recognition of your colleagues is great. The public attention is a mixed blessing.

Everybody has to learn for the first time.

I certainly saw science as a kind of calling, and one with as much legitimacy as a religious calling.

Although I am a public figure, I'm still a little shy. I don't think my own personality is important. I prefer to keep some small dosage of privacy.