Quotes About Data

Our communications services revenue growth is being driven by continued strong top-line performance in data, Internet and international - three of the fastest growing and most profitable areas within communications services.

Netflix and Amazon know when you stop and start a program, whether you wanted the whole thing, all of that.

And anytime a programmer makes a decision about how to deal with data, how to average it or clean it, you're imparting more of your own bias on it.

I took computers in high school. I would do all my own programming, but I didn't see the future of computers for anything other than data processing. Who was going to use a computer for communications?

Police departments no longer have to pay overtime or divert resources from other projects to find out where an individual goes - all they have to do is place a tracking device on someone's car or ask a cell phone company for that individual's location history and the technology does the work for them.

We resurrect 'Mezzanine' with a promise that we can break free from the data of the past and escape the feedback loops.

The most promising privacy thing is stupid phones. I'm dumping all my smart phones.

Should Ford succeed in equipping all its cars with information that gets communicated back to its servers, it will become a 'big data' company, a beyond-vehicles opportunity that is as promising as it is murky.

I promoted Hyderabad to the world by saying that there was privacy in India and their data will be sage. Data is wealth.

I think actively promoting women in science is very important because the data has certainly shown that there has been an underrepresentation.

When there are hiring decisions and promotion decisions to be made, people are hungry for data.

Facebook is a known behemoth corporate monopoly. It has exposed at least 87 million people's data, enabled foreign propaganda and perpetuated discrimination. We shouldn't be begging for Facebook's endorsement of laws, or for Mark Zuckerberg's promises of self-regulation.

With the new medium of knowledge - the Internet - knowledge not only takes on properties of that medium but also lives at the level of the network.

People assume that we have certain rights based on property that may be different now in a digital world.

I do have two data identities. I have my name, Bruce Sterling, which is my public name under which I write novels. I also have my other name, which is my legal name under which I own property and vote.

It's easy for me to see how a business proposition is going to play out, or who our next-generation competitors are, from taking this data point from this customer and another data point from another customer... and jump to Z.

Americans have a right to the security of their personal information, and the entities that hold personal information have a responsibility to protect it.

I call up Amazon. It seems to me they do a major thing wrong, right. I mean, they protect me against the loss of a $50 liability I have of something on my credit card, but they do nothing to protect me against somebody who is watching to see what books I'm interested in, what new perversions I've developed.

All the new data, applications, and e-commerce that are created have to be managed and protected. Additionally, when there is a new application, the old application is still there, and has to be protected.

There should be an understanding and trust that your privacy and data will be protected.

Our view is that if the network is involved, then we are there to protect it. Based on that, future developments will revolve around ensuring data, networks and applications are protected.

People want to have some assurance that their privacy, their data is going to be protected.

The State of Missouri is committed to protecting the data of the public.

We need a basic protection for people having access to their data and knowing where their data is.