Quotes About Science

There are a lot of very brilliant scholars who believe the reason we have incomplete science on evolution is that there is a higher power involved in this.

Trying to defend religion by invoking science is like claiming that three plus four equals ice cream.

Is there a way to discuss climate change without politics or religion getting in the way?

Art, science, philosophy, religion -- each offers at best only a crude simplification of actual living experience.

My religious superstition gave place to rational ideas based on scientific facts, and in proportion as I looked at everything from a new standpoint, I grew more happy day by day.

Some of my friends like to keep science and religion together, but I certainly like to keep them separate.

Science and religion are, of course, two different ways of looking at the universe; and it's the same universe with two different windows.

I think science and religion should be separate.

Photons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic.

They (religions) dread the advance of science as witches do the approach of daylight and scowl on the fatal harbinger announcing the subversions of the duperies on which they live.

Science is increasingly answering questions that used to be the province of religion.

I say you don't need religion, or political ideology, to understand human nature. Science reveals that human nature is greedy and selfish, altruistic and helpful.

We have grasped the mystery of the atom and rejected the Sermon on the Mount.

I have a hard time believing that billions of years ago two protozoa bumped into each other under a volcanic cesspool and evolved into Cindy Crawford.

I don't see why religion and science can't get along. What's wrong with counting our blessings with a computer?

Meditation is not a religion but a scientific way to enhance the concentration power of the mind.

To base the unexplainabilty and the immense wonder of nature onto an other miracle (God) is unnecessary and not acceptable for any serious th

The disruption of science is one which abandons the method and seeks to conquer grounds outside its territory. It is not at all religion but this pseudo-science that is the enemy of science.

Where religion clashes with science is that religion makes smart people do stupid things.

If the creation of the Universe was left up to a atheist, we would still have nothing.

The scientists who attack mainstream religion, rather than striving for peaceful coexistence with it, damage science, and also weaken the fight against fundamentalism.

To an honest judge, the alleged marriage between religion and science is a shallow, empty, spin-doctored sham.

Religion is poison because it asks us to give up our most precious faculty, which is that of reason, and to believe things without evidence. It then asks us to respect this, which it calls faith.

But who is more ignorant? The man who cannot define lightning, or the man who does not respect its awesome power?