Quotes About Science

I've always been fascinated by real scientists - Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, and so many others - how they've come up with solutions to very complicated problems that nobody else can seem to figure out.

Physicists are working on the Big Bang, and one day they may or may not solve it.

I've always been interested in forensics and the way they solve things.

I wanted to rewrite the code of life, to make new molecular machines that would solve human problems.

It is evident that one cannot say anything demonstrable about the problem before having resolved these preliminary questions, and yet we hardly possess the necessary information to solve some of them.

Science has the potential to solve all kinds of problems, but it depends on what a society wants to accomplish.

I wanted to make enzymes that would solve human problems, not just problems for a cell that makes them.

What is the relation between Christianity and modern culture; may Christianity be maintained in a scientific age? It is this problem which modern liberalism attempts to solve.

Basically, I like research because research is like to solve the quiz, you know. Always there is a problem, and I have to solve the problem. So I like those patterns. It's almost like research is sort of in a quiz.

If you just have a single problem to solve, then fine, go ahead and use a neural network. But if you want to do science and understand how to choose architectures, or how to go to a new problem, you have to understand what different architectures can and cannot do.

Remember in 1973 the same science chatter said that the coming Ice Age is going to occur, we're going to lose millions of people. And the politicians knew how to solve it, they just didn't have the courage to solve it; they were going to put coal dust on the Arctic.

The best science frequently combines an awareness of broad and significant problems with focus on an apparently small issue or detail that someone very much wants to solve or understand. Sometimes these little problems or inconsistencies turn out to be the clues to big advances.

Data helps solve problems.

I love science, and I believe in it. I have a faith that science can solve problems and make the world a better place.

In science, one should use all available resources to solve difficult problems. One of our most powerful resources is the insight of our colleagues.

Science, it is said, no doubt has ameliorated the material conditions of human life, but is powerless to solve those moral and philosophical questions that interest cultured people so deeply.

The way to solve problems in the world is to become scientists and technologists and build things that haven't been built before and discover things that people really don't know about.

In mathematics and science we solve our problems as well as create them. But in art and philosophy things are not so simple.

There is no problem in science that can be solved by a man that cannot be solved by a woman.

No observational problem will not be solved by more data.

The hardest problems of pure and applied science can only be solved by the open collaboration of the world-wide scientific community.

While the circumnavigation of the solar system seems farfetched, it may not be once the problem of effective anti-gravitational control is solved.

I sort of feel that climate change will be solved by science. I just feel instinctively that we will find a way of saving ourselves. But I am less confident that we won't destroy ourselves in other ways.

Take the situation of a scientist solving a problem, where he has certain data, which call for certain responses. Some of this set of data call for his applying such and such a law, while others call for another law.