Quotes About Innovation

Like all software, Qmail can survive only when it keeps up with changing requirements.

Of course, we didn't survive to play all the way through the '90s, so I can say that - as I said, everybody in the band was aware of this, and we trying to figure out ways to make it different.

I think if German literature could survive the '40s and Russian literature could survive Sovietism, American literature can survive Google.

I come from the hi-tech world - you don't survive if you don't constantly reinvent yourself every few years.

When I see how fast technology is advancing, my mind thinks of evolution and how organisms also have to evolve or adapt in order to, in their case, survive.

There was once a time when art history and film were basically the same medium, but art history is frozen in late-19th-century technology that has survived into the early 21st century.

If you don't have a real stake in the new, then just surviving on the old - even if it is about efficiency - I don't think is a long-term game.

PC gaming has always been strong, and I see it surviving for quite a few more years. It will be around for at least as long as people use PCs.

In a competitive industry, only paranoid incumbents - those constantly striving for betterment - have any hope of surviving.

Instead of abandoning competition and giving banks protected monopolies once again, the public would be better served by making it easier to close banks when they get into trouble. Instead of making banking boring, let us make it a normal industry, susceptible to destruction in the face of creativity.

I never want to make one type of music. You wouldn't just eat sushi for the rest of your life - there's so much more food.

All my books are made up of other books. They're all deeply structured on other fiction, because I was a student in fiction and I didn't have much actual living to draw on. I suspect a lot of other people's novels are like that, too, though they might be slower to talk about it.

I do think... gene technology has got real benefits to offer, which will have maybe an occasional downside, but I suspect not very many.

I would suspect strongly that over a period of time, if we put our mind to going to Mars, it will be a consortium of several countries.

There's no lack of talent out there. I suspect there is a lack of creative guidance, and that would not be solely the responsibility of a director but also a producer.

My experience in science has always been that the future always exceeds what we believe is possible. I suspect that we will explore the universe.

A lot of times, I think people feel that new plays are suspect, and actually, I don't know where that came from. I completely disagree with it!

I get my best ideas in that state of suspended consciousness just before sleep.

My sole aim is to leave everything in suspension, in flux, in order to avoid our community solidifying into a conventional academy. Our initial resources may be few, but our spirits are high, receptive, and excited, and that seems to me to be the most important thing right now.

The lurking suspicion that something could be simplified is the world's richest source of rewarding challenges.

We are living, we have long been told, in the Information Age. Yet now we are faced with the sickening suspicion that technology has run ahead of us.

My suspicion is that a lot of these office buildings will start to evolve from being optimized for individual offices or cube space to being hot offices where you decide which day you're going to come in and then you reserve a desk.

Yet now we are faced with the sickening suspicion that technology has run ahead of us.

I have a sneaking suspicion that if there were a way to make movies without actors, George Lucas would do it.