Quotes About Literature

Follow me if you have the mind for literature; otherwise, you would find nothing other than that.

Molten gold thrown of ground solidifies into an ungainly mass, but put in moulds becomes attractive jewelry. Similarly, unarticulated thoughts reduced to writing will be nothing but meaningless jumble; whereas, properly reasoned and structured thoughts expressed in writing become meaningful, and if well written, can become masterpieces of literature.

My feelings and thoughts that I write in your language without copyright are a charity for literature, and I certainly never carry expectations of appreciation for that. However, conveying to others that becomes your charity as well.

Note: Whenever I study Albert Einstein's Quotes, I realize he was only a theoretical physicist but not a philosopher in the context of literature. What do you think about it? Weak people revenge Strong people forgive Intelligent people ignore - Albert Einstein Weak people stay powerless Strong people revenge Intelligent people forgive - Ehsan Sehgal

Only literature, mirrors and reflects, our thoughts, conduct, attitude, character, system, knowledge, and life that, we execute in society.

Sensible and scholarly figures enjoy and praise literary writings; conversely, others focus on the writer's pics, especially when it is a beauty of the female, which mostly prevails knowledge and ability.

The stolen ideas, words, and quotes do not make you a unique author. You are only a thief of the literature, and pseudo-intellectual.

The worth, height, and beauty of writing lie in its level and nature of fiction.

The worth, height, and beauty of writing, lie upon its level and nature of fiction.

Awards are the only currency Amercian writing has to describe a writer's work.

I'm from a family of readers. Not of great books, but of great reading

Grammar is the grave of letters.

I do not read a book; I hold a conversation with the author.

The reason that fiction is more interesting than any other form of literature, to those who really like to study people, is that in fiction the author can really tell the truth without humiliating himself.

I'm not wise, but I read a lot of novels.

I believe that books, once they are written, have no need of their authors.

Perhaps Lila was right: my book—even though it was having so much success—really was bad, and this was because it was well organized, because it was written with obsessive care, because I hadn't been able to imitate the disjointed, unaesthetic, illogical, shapeless banality of things.

Even Tolstoy is an insignificant shadow if he takes a stroll with Anna Karenina.

Translation is our salvation: it draws us out of the well in which, entirely by chance, we are born.

Why would anyone be interested in my little personal story if we can do without Homer's or Shakespeare's? Someone who truly loves literature is like a person of faith. The believer knows very well that there is nothing at all at the bureau of vital statistics about the Jesus that truly counts for him.

The 'right reading' is an invention of academics and critics. Every reader gets from the book he is reading nothing else but his book. The shelves where we line up the volumes we've read are deceptive. We have available there only titles, covers, pages. But the books we've truly read are phantoms conjured up by reading with no rules.

Why did she talk to me about how soles were ground and not about what she read?

There is this presumption, in those who feel destined for art and above all literature: we act as if we had received an investiture, but in fact no one has invested us with anything, it is we who have authorized ourselves to be authors.

In my spare time I didn't go out, I sat and read novels I got from the library: Grazia Deledda, Pirandello, Chekhov, Gogol, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky.