Quotes About Policy

As a governor, I am naturally inclined to focus on the domestic side of protecting the United States.

Under the guise of protecting us from ourselves, the right and the left are becoming ever more aggressive in regulating behavior.

Protecting the environment is just as important a priority as the economic imperatives.

No issue is more important to this Congress than securing our borders and protecting our homeland, and I guarantee it is very important to our constituents.

I support DACA, but I also support protecting the border.

My role is not to choose between safeguarding the economy and protecting the environment - it's about doing both.

The government has a key role in regulating and making sure there's an even playing field and protecting consumers. No question about it.

As Democrats, we have a patriotic duty and political imperative to lay out our ideas for protecting America.

There is nothing unbiblical about building a wall and protecting citizens.

At a policy level, we can support protecting and serving as opposed to militarization or disproportionate response. Step one is making sure we don't militarize and actually call for a review of military equipment in New York police forces.

I believe in the Green New Deal. Fundamentally, what we recognize is that we don't have to choose between protecting our planet and growing our economy and creating jobs and opportunity.

While I am passionately committed to protecting abortion access, I do not view it as a stand-alone issue.

Cheap labor explains why there is so much resistance to protecting America's border.

I decided a long time ago that protecting our Second Amendment means doing so across the board, no exceptions.

There is a reason and a need to have an Environmental Protection Agency.

The only good place for a sage grouse to be listed is on the menu of a French bistro. It does not deserve federal protection, period.

There must be protection of the external borders.

You name it - it is something every day from the Environmental Protection Agency, and every group I talk to is the same message: 'Please stop them. Please stop.'

Although we must change the ways we protect our country, we must also guard against policies that appear attractive but offer little real protection and may even impede our ability to protect ourselves.

It should be noted that the EPA's banning of methanol is categorically absurd from the point of view of environmental protection.

You begin to see that all of these things are connected: The kind of cuts that mean less environmental protection are also the kind of cuts that mean less musical education for the schools and that also mean more overcrowded schools.

We shouldn't leave the E.U. until we have trade protection at least as good.

The United States can't keep a completely open system if the rest of the world is less open. The United States may have to take a leaf out of the book of Japan, China, and Germany, and have protectionism inside the system.

Trade protectionism has an American lineage dating back to the Founders; that lineage is distinct from white nationalism.