Quotes About Policy

If you're sick, you should be able to see a doctor. And if you're seen, you should be able to afford the bill and your medicine without going broke. There is absolutely nothing radical about this.

Radical changes will come to the Netherlands. We stand for fundamental choices, and we need to make the right ones.

Electing radical reformers as district attorneys is huge. It's essential.

The SNP are far from radical, but they do have a knack for producing the odd simple, progressive policy that's hard to argue against.

The Obama administration excelled at pushing its radical agenda through any means necessary. Since its gun-control agenda was not going anywhere, it decided to control ammunition, which would have had the same effect.

The IIP had to be folded up by the Harper Conservatives after it became clear - and as it took the 'South China Morning Post's Ian Young to reveal - that Canada's ragged refugee-class immigrants had contributed more to Revenue Canada than the IIP's big-spender immigrant investors did over the life of the program.

I'm interested in the idea that we have a more inclusive, clearer set of objectives. I would want us to have a set of objectives which does include public ownership of some necessary things such as rail.

Ed Miliband rails against energy companies and says the market isn't working. But wasn't he Britain's first secretary of state for energy and climate change in 2008?

No matter the evidence or the experience, the Conservative party has been allergic to direct state involvement in running our railways.

If every American automatically has health coverage, the age at which Medicare kicks in becomes a less fraught issue. We could gradually raise the age of Medicare eligibility a bit, according to income, and save money.

We're going to have to raise revenues in some form or fashion, and we're going to have to cut spending, including entitlements of all kind, including the military. We all know this. Lets get on with it.

What you really want to do is sit down and find a place that you can control government spending and raise more revenue.

Demanding abrupt and expensive changes in public policy raises fair questions about ideological intentions.

I'm much more interested in raising revenues for businesses than for the government.

I am philosophically opposed to raising the retirement age. I misspoke and said I was not philosophically opposed.

If a private investor is raising his hand and saying, 'I don't have the conditions with which to work,' then the government has the responsibility to create those conditions.

The Liberal carbon tax is just about raising revenue for government.

The reason I'm opposed to raising the gas tax is I believe it would hurt working Mississippi families more so than anybody else in the state.

Investment comes to a halt in a country where sit-ins and protest rallies lead to political chaos.

I'm a proponent of single-payer health-care, public education, protecting the environment - all the things Democrats rally around.

I praised the government when they do good things like scrapping of Article 370, construction of Ram Mandir, implementation of CAA among others.

I ran for Congress because I want to help change the way we do business in Washington, D.C.

Eventually, Nixon ran a very centrist presidency, not a Goldwater conservative presidency.

I always assumed the Department of Agriculture was the farmer and rancher's friend.