Quotes About Policy

The natural consequence of our submission, even in part, to the system that looks to compelling the export of raw products, the exhaustion of the land, the cheapening of labour, and the export of the labourer.

It's neither appropriate nor responsible if I drastically amend a policy after one, two, or three submissions of opinion.

I consider that France does not have to submit to the calendar of the United States, so I want France to leave the integrated command of NATO.

I would submit a balanced budget if elected president, and it would be painful.

It seems clear to me that the Obama Administration has no human rights policy. That is, while in some inchoate sense they would like respect for human rights to grow around the world, as all Americans would, they have no actual policy to achieve that goal - and they subordinate it to all their other policy goals.

If you're going to maintain true authorities over a subordinate organization, you have to have some control over policy formulation of that organization and also the resources that are applied to it.

What we did was make it easier for people to subscribe to and expand Obamacare.

A new procurement policy had to be brought in 2016. Subsequent to it, procurement has gone up rapidly.

From the beginning of time, business has cozied up to government and gotten restrictions on competition and subsidies and stuff.

That means following a very restrictive fiscal and monetary policy which will squeeze the monopolies and cut their subsidies. On the micro level we will allow other economic agents, both domestic and foreign, to compete with them.

Subsidies are hugely important; they represent America's de facto energy policy.

Eventually, the economy will work well when you reduce subsidies. People have got used to getting some handouts from governments.

If Federal Reserve loans are subsidies, it doesn't show up in the federal budget.

The whole tax code should be looked at, all the way from farm subsidies to carried interest to - to corporate loopholes, because we really need to raise more revenue.

I am a free market Republican. I am against subsidies, in most cases.

I'm a liberal - I believe in subsidies for public goods and in regulations to curb harmful externalities, but neither of those things exist when it comes to parking.

Subsidies should never be a permanent feature of any market. They should be introduced only to address market failure and they should be withdrawn gradually as those distortions in the market are addressed.

The farm subsidy program is something that was put into place over 60 years ago, and it was put into place to do one thing, and it's turned into something else.

I believe that birth control is just like every other medication even though it's a controlled substance.

We think that the Kyoto protocol is a necessary document, necessary process. I am convinced that we will agree to disagree about substance.

Even those that hate Hillary admit she is a work horse and not a show horse. She gets down into the nuts and bolts and figures out, 'What's the policy, what's the substance?'

I think issues and substance, policy and vision and record should be the meat of politics.

Any reasonable person looking at the policy results... the substance... the facts would agree that the Trump presidency is one of the most successful in American history.

The Farm Bill is one of the only bills that provides substantial deficit reduction that passed the Senate this year. It only makes sense that this deficit reduction bill would be included in a larger deficit reduction agreement.