Quotes About Search

Algú va dir que la veritat surt quan es busca.

Nadie sabe en dónde queda mi país, lo buscan entristeciéndose de miopía: no puede ser, tan pequeño ¿y es tanta su desgarradura, tanto su terremoto, tanta tortura militar, más trópico que el trópico?

El verdadero problema está en el arranque, en el punto de partida... tengo que encontrar esa primera frase. Tengo que encontrarla.

I'm sick to death—Oh when shall I get loose From this vain world, the abode of guilt and sorrow! —And yet methinks a beam of light breaks in On my departing soul. Alas! I fear 95 I've been too hasty. O ye powers that search The heart of man, and weigh his inmost thoughts, If I have done amiss, impute it not!— The best may err, but you are good, and—oh!  [Dies.]

I don't believe people are looking for the meaning of life as much as they are looking for the experience of being alive.

It is hard to find a butterfly in the city environment.

Cercando la parola si trovano i pensieri.

A search party was much more sensible than Leafpool's desperate plea for dreams. She was as edgy as a deer these days.

you'll find the dry bed of a winter stream. You may find something there.

Let's go," he meowed. "I'll skin the little wretch when we find him, upsetting the camp like this.

Traži badem u džepu, gleda ga posred dlana, školjku s dvije zape?a?ene ljušture. Pipaju?i uokolo potraži kamen, uzme ga i po?ne lagano udarati po ljusci. Zvuk prelazi od suhog do dubokog, znak da se otvara. Dolazi do popuštanja, otvorila se pukotina, oslobodio se plod ispalog badema. Prije nego što ga stavi u usta, diže ga uvis i poljubi ga. Uzima ga na jezik kao hostiju, po?inje ga sisati. Život, koliko malo ga treba za potpunu sre?u.

Fourth Amendment protection against a search has a "twofold requirement, first that a person have exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and, second, that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as 'reasonable.'"11

The Court held that police may obtain cellular location information—information that can be used to determine where a person was at a particular time—only if they have a warrant based on probable cause or if emergency circumstances justify allowing the search without a warrant.

California v. Greenwood in 1988, the Court held that when police searched a person's garbage that was left on the street for pickup, there was not a search, and no warrant was required.

a reasonable search for weapons for the protection of the police officer, where he has reason to believe that he is dealing with an armed and dangerous individual, regardless of whether he has probable cause to arrest the individual for a crime."28

This decision means that the police can enter a home or a business illegally, and if they see contraband or evidence of illegal activity, they can then go to a magistrate for a warrant. The police don't have to tell the judge about their illegal entry. They

That the search violated the Fourth Amendment was undisputed—it had been done without probable cause. But the Supreme Court ruled that the evidence was nonetheless admissible at trial.

when police violate the Fourth Amendment's requirement for "knock and announce," the exclusionary rule does not apply.

The Court explicitly rejected the argument that the government had to show that the consent to a search had to involve a person's "knowing" waiver of his or her rights.

Justice Stewart wrote that the way the search was done had nothing to do with the reliability of the evidence.

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte is important on many levels. First, it dramatically empowers police to be able to search. It obviates the need for police to meet all the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, such as the need for probable cause (or at least reasonable suspicion) and the need for a warrant. It is estimated that consent searches comprise over 90 percent of all warrantless searches.

Miller says that when police obtain information that a person has shared with a third party, it is not a search. Therefore, the requirements for probable cause and a warrant—the key protections of privacy under the Fourth Amendment—do not apply or need to be met.

The automobile exception provides that police may search a car without a warrant when they have probable cause that it may contain contraband or evidence of illegal activity.

Carroll v. United States, in 1925, involved a search of a car without a warrant, for bootleg liquor.65 The Court, in an opinion written by Chief Justice Taft, explained that the mobility of cars justified allowing police to search them without needing a warrant because the "vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought."66