Quotes About Individual

One person of integrity can make a difference.

Art is aesthetic communication of the soul—in fact, it's the best of that communication—and taken in its entirety has formed a body of work to stand alongside Science and Religion as one of the three great constructs of culture to aid the individual in his or her struggle to survive in Nature.

Sexual harassment is using what Nature gave us to take what isn't ours. It's an act of violence not only against an individual, but the group—and it inevitably meets with the wrath of the group.

Reading his account leaves one with the impression that being taken out of oneself, forgetting oneself as an individual, as he puts it, invariably leads to a contemplative state from which all passion is absent. In fact, he describes the aesthetic attitude as an objective frame of mind, as if stepping into another world, 'where everything that moves our will, and thus violently agitates us, no longer exists'.20

What music expresses, is eternal, infinite and ideal; it does not express the passion, love, or longing of such-and-such an individual on such-and-such an occasion, but passion, love or longing in itself, and this it presents in that unlimited variety of motivations, which is the exclusive and particular characteristic of music, foreign and inexpressible to any other language.

But attachment theory, in my view, does less than justice to the importance of work, to the emotional significance of what goes on in the mind of the individual when he is alone, and, more especially, to the central place occupied by the imagination in those who are capable of creative achievement. Intimate attachments are a hub around which a person's life revolves, not necessarily the hub.

The question of how to spend my life, of what my life is for, is a question posed only to me, and I can no more delegate the responsibility for answering it than I can delegate the task of dying.

We hear our legislators proclaim unceasingly their respect for the individual conscience, though it be a religious conscience, and themselves anticlericals. All the same, all their efforts tend to, dissociate us, and to reduce us to the state of amorphous dust. They can bear no organised society other than what they call a lay society no government other than their government and no social finality other than their temporal aspirations.

Ideas and opinions are not spontaneously "born" in each individual brain: they have had a centre of formation, or irradiation, of dissemination, of persuasion-a group of men, or a single individual even, which has developed them and presented them in the political form of current reality.

A person who is an ethically right has to only fight for own rights against the big battalion of the population, but one is wrong morally can go easily long in relationship with the billions of people.

A private organisation may not have sufficient apple or other essential ingredients in its monthly stock, but its top brass will only talk about individual's performance pie i.e. achievement vs target of apple-pie sales in the meeting.

An extraordinary post of an ordinary, simple netizen is liked usually by none of the people in his individual, social media circle but if the same is shared by a person having a lot of money then it is liked by many ones and when it is done by a honey girl, the support to the same post is going to be the most. Such an absurd mentality is seen in the majority of the population who vote.

Most adults have an adulterated mind with too much selfishness inside it and that's why they can never truly differentiate between a positive and a negative individual.

Most people don't give any credit to a person until they see their individual profit only, and even worse is that there are many who don't even give plaudit to anyone no matter how much he does things good for others. This is enough to know the true nature of everyone especially someone who publicly claims to be selected or elected to the top position of power by the majority of the population.

People interfere in a person's internal family matters not with an intention to resolve the feud, but mere with a selfish interest of showing own importance as a judge. Only foolish individual invites those devilish minds as mediators in own private home dispute.

People unite in a group merely for each person's individual's profit only,otherwise never and not.

People usually never support a simple person's valid, honest point on his individual social networking account, but if that hits their vested interest like an electric current, then they will instantly give thereupon an unpleasant comment

People who do not want the good change often ask only Individual to change i.e 'I' not the group i.e 'We', as they know this would never happen any day.

Selfishness has made most people so mentally blind, virtually deaf and sensibly dumb that they can't see, hear and speak anything besides and beyond their individual profit in everything and literally do not understand that which is actually of everyone's benefit.

The strength of the team is each individual member, but how strong or weak the team is actually is determined by the prowess of the person at the leadership position.

The world doesn't need CHANGE, all it requires only right CORRECTION in everyone's action, whenever required, as the interpretation to the meaning of CHANGE has a different connotation based on an individual's level of the perception, the width of the imagination and the depth of the introspection.

There are many who can even marry for merely money to lead own individual life in luxury and they can often pose to get own pic posted on media page and pretend to be a happily married couple.

There is nothing a person can do of his/her own because even what everyone dreams or desires is also decided by their respective destiny.

Never give advice in a crowd.