Quotes About Integrity

I'm saying that the WMD reporting was not consciously evil. It was bad journalism, even very bad journalism.

I'm in the reporting part of journalism.

I'm convinced you can combine this with reporting integrity and accuracy.

When we are reporting the news, we make every effort to report it in as factual way as possible.

Okay, I'm not in the news business, and I'm not going to tell anyone how to do their job. However, it'd be good to have news reporting that I could trust again, and there's evidence that fact-checking is an idea whose time has come.

Whenever you're reporting, there's always something you can't say or write, but the questions, you always want to get as close to that line as possible. You want to ask the tough questions.

But there's a big difference between, say, reporting on a story and simply making up a story.

Americans deserve journalists who provide responsible, objective reporting.

Certainly in my own body of reporting, I was very acutely aware of the risk of any mischaracterized journalism and the need for anything I put out to be absolutely bulletproof.

Obviously, if I cared about what people said about my reporting, I wouldn't be a good journalist.

One should never ignore or be afraid of reporting or calling out a harasser. There is no shame in doing so.

So many reporters have blurred the line between reporting and editorializing.

And they asked me to take a polygraph as to the allegations and reports I'd made. I volunteered and I took the polygraph and passed it without a glitch.

Initial reports are encouraging. In the end of the day, it's going to be deeds, not words, that matter.

The media's gotten lazy. They don't check anything out. You report what he reports.

On the golf course, playing cards, running to the casinos, betting on college and pro football, it keeps spilling over to the next step, the next step, the next step. I basically started giving people information that I was receiving in the locker room, injury reports.

If you know something is morally reprehensible, then it is your moral obligation to stop it as soon as possible.

If you choose to put political expediency and politics ahead of the men and women on the ground, for that, you'll have to answer to yourself. I find it morally reprehensible.

I find it reprehensible that anyone would seek to denigrate the legacy of Dr. King in any way.

I can't tell you how many times I've had conversations with politicians who've done something morally reprehensible but not indictable, yet still think they should be able to stay in office. The office isn't a 'right.' It's a kind of loan.

An ethical man doesn't need a consensus of his allies in order to act against something he finds reprehensible.

I don't try to represent myself in a way that's not connected with my everyday reality, because I'm not smart enough to do that.

The way I try to represent my family and coaches, I think all are characteristics the league aspires to portray. That's just who I am.

I do not represent any product or any collection.