Quotes About Interaction

As a filmmaker and an actor, my job is to react towards people, but I want a reaction from them.

The most charming thing about theatre is that you get an instant reaction from the audience.

I appreciate an audience that reacts to the music, even if they jump on stage and try to beat us up, I think that's a fantastic reaction. I think that they're really hearing something then.

We as comics do want an immediate response from the audience. It's really quiet on the set, and there are only the producers, and the director, so a comic is looking for someone to give a reaction, even if it is the camera guy.

When you meet someone, there's an initial reaction and then as you get to know them, things change, things deepen, or they go the other way.

I like working on stage because there's something very immediate about it, that interaction with an audience where you immediately hear their reaction, or feel them, whether they're with you.

Everything is a reaction.

I just like being a social experiment sometimes. I really should not be allowed in public. But I just go out into the public just to see people's reaction.

Any reaction is better than none.

Maybe we could think of science as being like a nuclear chain reaction in which people and ideas bounce off each other, and if critical mass is reached, a new field is formed.

When I think of myself interacting with material that I like, that's the material that inherently appeals to me, that gives me room to have my own reaction.

I have this problem that I just like to get a reaction from people.

As in nature, so in politics: Every action has a reaction.

It is a feel-good factor when you get an instant reaction from the audience.

I can't go into a mob scene and sense the mood and the attitude of the crowd. I can't conduct man-on-the-street interviews or even get reactions that I can be sure are honest, because they know who I am.

I like to show my cards and see people's reactions.

Ranveer is a great co-actor. He is extremely reactive and extremely responsive. He is a pleasure to work with.

I don't read the comments of fans, no.

I can't write without a reader. It's precisely like a kiss - you can't do it alone.

I'm very aware of the presence of a reader, and that probably is a reaction against a lot of poems that I do read which seem oblivious to my presence as a reader.

It would be easier to write a novel without reader input, but I feel the fiction is richer for it.

A writer without a reader doesn't exist.

I think that reading is always active. As a writer, you can only go so far; the reader meets you halfway, bringing his or her own experience to bear on everything you've written. What I mean is that it is not only the writer's memory that filters experience, but the reader's as well.

I like the eclipses, the synaptic jumps of short stories. The reader has to participate very actively in the experience.