Quotes About Renewable

We live in a disposable society. It's easier to throw things out than to fix them. We even give it a name - we call it recycling.

Fish are a renewable resource, and one of the problems we've had is people feel obliged to catch the limit, then throw 'em in the garbage can.

Mass adoption of renewable energies would thus necessitate a fundamental reshaping of modern energy infrastructures.

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, we are looking to make India self-reliant in terms of power requirement, along with providing carbon-free sources of power, thus improving India's position globally.

Putting a price on carbon pollution is one of the best things we can do to stem the tide of climate change.

As the technology for solar cells gets better and better, this form of clean, renewable energy will find more applications that take up less space and produce more electricity, to meet the energy needs of our homes, schools and businesses.

Increasing recycling in Delaware is an idea whose time has come and, if put off, may not come again.

Think on a 50-year scale, which is a much more natural time-scale for global warming. The US is right now spending about 200 million dollars annually on research into renewable energy.

It is time for a sustainable energy policy which puts consumers, the environment, human health, and peace first.

There's never been a better time than now to start or accelerate a greentech venture.

Imagination is a writer's refuge and a renewable source of energy.

What we need is NOT a Green New Deal but a Green Smart Deal.

We have this handy fusion reactor in the sky called the sun. You don't have to do anything, it just works. Shows up everyday and produces ridiculous amounts of power.

Here at this site, Solyndra expects to make enough solar panels each year to generate 500 megawatts of electricity. And over the lifetime of this expanded facility, that could be like replacing as many as eight coal-fired power plants.

Is recycling to do with global warming? Need you ask? Well, I only ask because we've been recycling for twenty years or so, and no one was talking about global warming back then.

I am one of those from the green movement who recognises the low carbon benefits of nuclear generation.

There is no 'recycle too much.' That's an oxymoron.

We need to throw away less, recycle a lot more and turn much of the rest into energy.

If you're not buying recycled products, you're not really recycling.

For me, green is more about cycling than recycling.

If we got more efficient with electric grid capacity, we would substantially reduce our carbon footprint, and people would be likely to copy us.

Americans increasingly understand that clean energy is more than just an environmental issue. It is crucial to reducing our dangerous dependence on foreign countries.

Energy is one topic on which different countries can work together collaboratively. If we can all produce energy from an element that's available in abundance on our planet, that would be a good thing, but we have to learn how to produce energy in large quantities, cheaply, efficiently and without detriment to the environment.

Science tells us we need to keep the majority of fossil fuels in the ground, and that we must urgently invest in renewable energy, and other alternative industries. Doing so would create millions of jobs, ensure a fair transition for fossil fuel workers into new industries, and avert the most catastrophic climate breakdown.