Quotes About Credibility

The world has enabled so many bullshitters. It's exhausting.

The public will believe anything, so long as it is not founded on truth.

What's more, I don't believe any policeman uses words like "antonym". I don't believe you're a policeman at all.

98% of all statistics are made up.

Whoso boasteth himself of a false gift is like clouds and wind without rain.

Ipse dixit [He himself said it].

Don't hang noodles on my ears.

I would never do anything to harm the country or anything improper. I think most people who have dealt with me think I'm a pretty straight sort of guy, and I am.

Everyone should behave as if he carries the real thing.

He sounded almost too genuine to be genuine.

The power of the Internet is also its limitation - it provides access to large amounts of information without providing guidance on how to sort out what is credible and what is not.

After the dotcom boom blew up, it increased the focus on questions like, 'Why should I trust you to help run my business? How do I know you're not going to go away like every other company?' That was hard. We had to keep proving ourselves.

Album 1 is proving that you're worth listening to, album 2 is proving that it wasn't a fluke, and album 3 is the most authentic thing I've ever done.

An absence of credible information prevents citizens from participating in public decision-making, particularly on key issues of concern such as education, health, and governance.

Administrators are there because of the fans and the cricketers to run this game, so credibility of a game, or a board, or even a government for that matter, is important irrespective of what you do. If you are in public life, it is important.

Having a credible existence in the private sector frees people to be able to be better public servants. You're less concerned with... toeing the party line and more concerned with doing what is right.

Calling oneself a hero after making mistakes shouldn't earn public trust.

I'm a big fan of public trust.

The fact that a book or publication is popular does not necessarily make it of value.

I do not know of any credible evidence that suggests Dr. Zavos can clone a human being. This seems to be yet another one of his claims to get publicity.

Self-publishing provides more freedom and control, but it also provides more risk. Publishing provides more credibility and promotion, but your vision can also get lost in the bureaucratic machinery of the business. It's a tough decision to make.

Media doesn't like when other media gets their credentials pulled - that's not OK.

We have moved beyond the point of trust being simply a key factor in product purchase or selection of employment opportunity; it is now the deciding factor in whether a society can function.

You can Photoshop something, put it out, and everyone believes it.