Quotes About Impact

I really do not care that Messi isn't scoring every match. Leo always produces match-changing moments.

I believe that everything we think and feel and do produces a result and that we have to deal with that result - that result is then something that produces another result, so on and so forth, so yes, I do believe in causality.

My policies are producing results and will produce even more.

If you focus on producing a great experience for anyone, that's how you get big.

If you just focus on producing good outcomes, all that other stuff sorts itself out.

I might not be producing that much with the ball in my hands, but my fakes, my jet sweeps, it's doing numbers, and that's the main thing about it.

Kids are a product of their environment.

Your mission is to find a product or service that can positively impact the lives of 1 billion people because that's the game we're playing today.

A good advertisement is one which sells the product without drawing attention to itself.

When a company creates a product that directly or indirectly adversely impacts the health of people, that product must be regulated. The process by which it's created must be regulated. No company has the right to injure people. No company.

Not every Apple product makes a big enough difference to me to get instantly, although many do.

When I put my credibility behind someone, or anything - even if it's a product - to me, it has to help people.

When I lecture kids, I say, 'You've got to be ambitious by the advertising' - ambitious. You've got to say, 'See, this product? Maybe I can change the world with this product.' They look at me like I'm nuts, but that's what you can do.

But I think technology advertising will have to stop addressing how products are made and concentrate more on what a product will do for the consumer.

I don't know about doing a sequel. I think you can retroactively damage a product by adding to it.

You actually don't want people thinking your product is cool, because then you're a fad.

I have the conviction that excessive literary production is a social offence.

Excessive literary production is a social offense.

If we must have the Production Code, then I think the only way to use it effectively is to judge a film as a whole and determine whether its effect is good or bad.

If I'm not moved by what happens at the end of this play, then I've completely failed, and so has the play, and so has our production. And if that's the case then there really isn't any reason to want to do it.

If you destroyed half the pharmaceutical production in the United States, we'd think it's a pretty serious problem. In fact, we'd probably go to war.

Even though I'm an actor, I've gone to productions where there has been someone whose work is known in film, and you can't take your eyes off them. It unbalances the production. Whether they're good or not, it doesn't matter.

People talk about me in 'Arcadia' and I think I was okay in it but I've given better performances in other productions that didn't have the same impact. But I knew 'Arcadia' was going to be an event and I wanted to be part of it.

As an industry, the film industry is better than most. It's not perfect - I wish every company would carbon-offset their productions - but it's better than one would expect.