Quotes About Generalization

When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

If you believe the media, all Trump voters are mouth-breathers who can barely sign their name.

Always to see the general in the particular is the very foundation of genius.

People from North India are generally known to be aggressive and emotional.

The process of induction is the process of assuming the simplest law that can be made to harmonize with our experience.

Induction is the process of taking things within our experience to be representative of the world outside our experience. It is a process of projection or extrapolation.

Aron's training in worldliness was gained from a young man of no experience, which gave him the ability for generalization only the inexperienced can have.

But we learn nothing from any lesson because we have not the wisdom to work backwards from the particular to the general, and imagine ourselves always to be going through an experience which is without precedents in the past

I don't like to generalize but I've had nothing but bad experiences with Mexican food in Europe.

Stereotyping didn't become stereotyping without being rooted in fact. - Petra Reuter

You perceive I generalize with intrepidity from single instances. It is the tourist's custom.

It's not a stereotype if it's always true.

99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.

An extra-terrestrial philosopher, who had watched a single youth up to the age of twenty-one and had never come across any other human being, might conclude that it is the nature of human beings to grow continually taller and wiser in an indefinite progress towards perfection; and this generalization would be just as well founded as the generalization which evolutionists base upon the previous history of this planet.

Every generalization is dangerous, especially this one.

She knew that everything humans see is a simplification. A human sees the world in three dimensions. That is a simplification. Humans are fundamentally limited, generalising creatures, living on auto-pilot, who straighten out curved streets in their minds, which explains why they get lost all the time.

She knew that everything humans see is a simplification. A human sees the world in three dimensions. That is simplification. Humans are fundamentally limited, generalising creatures, living on auto-pilot, who straighten curved streets in their minds, which explains why they get lost all the time.

She knew that everything humans see is a simplification. A human sees the world in three dimensions. That is a simplification. Humans are fundamentally limited, generalizing creatures, living on auto-pilot, who straighten out curved streets in their minds, which explains why they get lost all the time.

I had been generalizing about the world so much that I began to lose my grasp of it.

same phenomenon and concludes that the phenomenon will always occur. Conclusions obtained by induction seem well warranted

We are quick to judge and generalise all the peoples by claiming that "I hate politics" or "I hate all the politicians".

all theories are oversimplifications, or at least lead to oversimplification.

In my history books I have already had my say in clear language and discursive meaning about community. Now what history means to me in images is freedom from coherence, clarity, and collective representation. My images carry their own visual meaning, which may or may not explicate history usefully or unequivocally. For me now, image works as particularity, not as generalization. That is how art school changed my thinking about history and how visual art set me free.