Quotes About Evaluation

We should look back now and then. Our politicians should look back every now and then.

I get asked a lot about getting into politics. I say, 'Take a look at politics. You tell me what seems appealing about that.'

One cannot judge the poll outcome by the crowds one draws at public meetings.

When you go to the polls, ethics and morality should be part of the evaluation.

When it comes to spiritual truth, how can we know that we are on the right path? One way is by asking the right questions - the kind that help us ponder our progress and evaluate how things are working for us.

But if our sex would but well consider and rationally ponder, they will perceive and find that it is neither words nor place that can advance them, but worth and merit.

If something doesn't work, you have to admit it. Always try to find what's going right and what's going wrong with your music. If you can, pool your resources and record yourself; do that frequently.

As players we're held accountable for poor performance, I think the same should be said for journalists.

When I look back at it, I'm mostly amazed at how poorly it was shot. David Kelley is a great writer, and I thought the scripts were great, but it just looks so cheap.

Popular and good and bad is not the same thing.

The world of scholarship is much more measured in its appreciation and also its criticism than the world of popular literature.

You just have to approach every day and say, 'If you were starting fresh today, what would my portfolio look like?' So that's how we think about it.

I'm still trying to discover my position on my own artwork and hopefully at this exhibition someone will come and tell me. I'm open to listening to criticism.

Before I ever endorse a candidate, I meet them, interview them, interview their colleagues and evaluate their competitors, study their positions and ideas, look at their campaign... then make a decision.

The learner always begins by finding fault, but the scholar sees the positive merit in everything.

I think of feedback as constructive, not positive or negative. You choose to do what you want with it.

If I had my way, I wouldn't do annual reviews, if I felt that everybody would be more honest about positive and negative feedback along the way. I think the annual review process is so antiquated.

I take criticism very positively if it's genuine.

Critics are just what they are. They're going to pick at the positivity of things.

It's like people think, 'Oh you're playing losing basketball. You're possessions don't matter.' I feel like they matter even more because that's when they're truly watching if you're developing or not.

To consult the statistician after an experiment is finished is often merely to ask him to conduct a post mortem examination. He can perhaps say what the experiment died of.

I try as much I can after every live performance to read all the comments my fans post on Facebook and Twitter, as this helps enormously for me to understand straight from fans what worked and what didn't.

I accept that 'Ee Varsham Sakshiga' had some flaws, which could have been rectified during post-production.

Art is always in the eyes of the beholder. Only posterity has the right to point out our mistakes.