Quotes About Distribution

It's illegitimate to talk about a post-scarcity Utopia without talking about questions of distribution. There have always been these Utopian predictions - 'electricity too cheap to meter' was the atomic promise of the 1950s.

We actually distribute using AirBnB because they're the vacation management company and they distribute us, which is why AirBnB is also a small shareholder in our company.

The rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine is one of the largest logistical undertakings our state has ever faced.

When the government controls a limited supply, the government gets to decide who gets the vaccines and who doesn't. In some cases, who lives and who doesn't.

From the day the first doses of the COVID-19 vaccines arrived in the Granite State, we hit the ground running to get the doses out the door and into the arms of our highest risk health care providers and long-term care residents.

Hollywood used to control the distribution; now Silicon Valley does.

Intellectuals feel they are the most valuable people, the ones with the highest merit, and that society should reward people in accordance with their value and merit. But a capitalist society does not satisfy the principle of distribution 'to each according to his merit or value.'

There's a substantial difference between dumping 100 copies of the 'Telegraph' at a Connex South Central station and giving away copies of the 'Business' with the 'Mail on Sunday.' 'This kind of circulation is valuable and enhances the brand. Leaving them anywhere willy-nilly devalues the brand.

Localities distributed east and west of each other at the same latitude share exactly the same day length and its seasonal variations. To a lesser degree, they also tend to share similar diseases, regimes of temperature and rainfall, and habitats or biomes (types of vegetation).

The forces in a capitalist society, if left unchecked, tend to make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Now we just really need to do the work, which we're doing, to get contraceptives out to women worldwide.

The movies have a way of seeping out there over time. We don't put them in 2,000 theaters. It wouldn't work that way.

As journalists, we need to find every avenue to distribute our work, and try to be so good that we become increasingly more influential than before.

As a filmmaker, you want your work seen by the widest audience possible.

The idea of a streaming service, like Netflix for music, I'm not totally against it. It's just we won't put all of our music on it until there are enough subscribers for it to make sense.

Technology has changed our industry, and I think that's opened up different revenue streams and ways to make money and distribute television. It's made the global conversation easier, quicker.

Even if there were no illegal copying, the advent of digital distribution will put a lot of stress on the movie and music industry. When the distribution costs comes down, that puts more price pressure on the rest of the cost.

I believe in a progressive tax structure that fairly distributes the costs of government in a way that those of us fortunate to have more, carry more of the burden.

Obama came in and gave $700 billion to the bankers off the top as opposed to giving $700 billion to the poor.

Conservatives believe the economy functions better if the rich have more money and everyone else has less. But they're wrong. It's just the opposite.

I don't want to kill windowing; I want to restore choice and options.

Maybe we ought to have a world in which things are divided between people kind of fairly.

Land has been an issue of great concern to our people.

All great enterprises are about logistics. Not genius or inspiration or flights of imagination, skill or cunning, but logistics.