Quotes About Globalization

Why do elites hate the poor? It's xenophobia. They don't know any poor people - except their off-the-books Brazilian nanny and illegal immigrant cleaning lady from Upper Revolta who don't speak English.

People say they don't want to call a call-centre in India. Why not? They're doing the same job - you just don't like Indians.

While nations protect their physical borders, tech platforms leave digital borders wide open.

World wide capitalism kills more people everyday then Hitler did. And he was crazy.

I think many years from now, people will still watch television, though it will probably be 150 inches wide. What will change is the ability to get 'CSI' not only on TV but also on the Internet, even watching it in a foreign country as it's playing in the U.S.

I believe we could see a North American Union formed. Why else are our borders with Mexico and Canada being left wide open some six years into a War on Terror?

Where the costs of entry are minimal, there is a wide avenue of opportunity for those with little or nothing, which is why football is just about the most democratic sport of all: African and Brazilian footballers compete on a level playing field with their rich white European counterparts.

Gandhi's ideas were rooted in a wide experience of a freshly globalized world.

The Internet opens up a whole new range of possibilities in a wide range of areas.

Ensuring that the benefits of globalisation are shared widely remains a challenge.

Baahubali... ' has been accepted widely amongst Hindi cinema-goers. So this shows that language is becoming less important.

The Law of Raspberry Jam: the wider any culture is spread, the thinner it gets.

The world is richer than ever, and the gaps between rich and poor are wider.

Greater technological connectivity makes the world wider, and the walls of isolation - thinner.

Hindi films offer a wider reach. As an industry, it has the capability to merge varied states, languages, and nationalities.

Large companies everywhere tend to be more productive than small ones. But the gap in productivity is far wider in developing countries.

For those who want out, Brexit remains an end in itself, regardless of what is in the interest of our society, in terms of prosperity, security and influence on the wider world stage.

Globalization is stirring widespread economic anxiety, and middle class incomes have stagnated while a class of super-rich has emerged.

Without the U.S. leading the way in trade negotiations, we likely will see irreversible damage to our environment and widespread abuse of labor and human rights, all while we lose out on the opportunity to expand our economy and create jobs.

Wild globalisation has benefited some, but it's been a catastrophe for most.

We hear foreign accents on CNN. It's crazy, it's wild, who knows, maybe they'll take you because you certainly don't fit in, in the American spectrum of news.

By and large the United States has been able to resist the temptation to close its doors to the world.

In emerging markets, slow growth in the advanced economies has shut down a traditional development path: export-led growth. As a result, emerging markets have had to rely once again on domestic demand. This is always a difficult task, given the temptation to over-stimulate.

I like England more than I did when I left. It's become a bit of a better country in the last ten years, in the attitude of it. A bit more Americanized, which is both good and bad. At least when you order a cup of coffee they don't give you a hard time.