Quotes About Analysis

When something gets attention so quickly, people sometimes will look for reasons to find fault and tear it down.

I was always tearing stuff apart to see how it worked.

Curiosity begins as an act of tearing to pieces or analysis.

Few reporters get to do what Kelly McEvers does in every episode of 'Embedded': go deep into a story and tease out what is really happening.

Sometimes it just becomes so technical that you forget what you're doing. If you start thinking about how you come down the stairs and think about how each muscle is working, you can't go down the stairs. Anyway, I'm a person who overthinks and overanalyzes everything, so if you give me one thought, it creates a lot more.

'What is this', and 'How is this done?' are the first two questions to ask of any work of art. The second question immediately illuminates the first, but it often doesn't get asked. Perhaps it sounds too technical. Perhaps it sounds pedestrian.

If I am looking at my work as an actor after having directed, I'm able to look at things in a much more technical way. There's no question about that.

China is so central to our economic lives that journalists have had no choice but to engage China with greater technical analysis and precision.

I would say Pep Guardiola's No. 1 quality is that he sees the technical and tactical aspect of a game really fast.

Pep's tactical and technical assessments are like nothing I've ever seen before, and I think that's why people enjoy to see him fail.

I don't consider myself a cartoonist, because to me a cartoonist has a lot of technical ability to draw and such. However, I do consider myself to have a bit of a cartoonist character. I definitely am analyzing and satirizing pop culture and politics and whatever strikes my fancy.

The more people that are interested in the technical side of things in the actual fight are better for the sport, in my opinion.

I like to watch the great players, the ones who are technically good and understand the game. I try to see how they move.

Comedy is so subjective, you know what I mean? To sit there and technically pick it apart is so stupid.

I have a big TV screen and I sit there and watch the Premier League and I get angry sometimes - 'I'm better than that guy sitting there.' Of course, I am joking. But I analyse. I look at it technically, how they play, how they defend, how they attack, why did he change that player? That's the only way I can look at it after all these years.

The most common things I would go out for would be, like, 'the Lab Technician' on a crime procedural, usually an expert in either a medical or a computer-oriented field.

Nuclear transplantation is a technique that has enormously facilitated the analysis of these interactions between nucleus and cytoplasm.

We can detect very small differences in telomere length, and it is a very simple and fast technique where many samples can be analysed at the same time. Most importantly, we are able to determine the presence of dangerous telomeres - those that are very short.

If you broke down my technique, it wouldn't really take a rocket scientist to do so.

Cricket takes so long. There's a lot of airtime to fill. Guys have to talk about someone's technique for half an hour.

If you only have 10 examples of something, it's going to be hard to make deep learning work. If you have 100,000 things you care about, records or whatever, that's the kind of scale where you should really start thinking about these kinds of techniques.

Very simple techniques, when you have a lot of data, work incredibly well.

As analytical pharmacologists, what we are allowed to see of a new molecule's properties is totally dependent on the techniques of bioassay we use.

I view my job more almost as a field biologist or anthropologist, where I'm collecting practices. I'm collecting techniques.