Quotes About Neutrality

The print and electronic media hold Interests, and interests never afford transparent Neutrality.

Though one writes about humanity, equality, neutrality, justice, and such other terms routinely; however, it is a pen, not character; otherwise, the entire world was at peace.

Undoubtedly, neutrality is such a context that only subsists and twists in the dictionaries and books, not in the minds practically.

Virtually, self-promotion is not an objectionable attempt when one's opponents occupy and block all corners of a neutral approach since it is the only way left to voice for justice and fairness.

But as the late- seventeenth-century philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz said, 'To be neutral is rather like someone who lives in the middle of a house and is smoked out from below and drenched with urine from above.

Justice cannot be for one side alone, but must be for both.

We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.

We would not have our country's vigour exhausted or her moral force abated, by everlasting meddling and muddling in every quarrel, great and small, which afflicts the world.

Sometimes there are no good guys. There are no bad guys. It seems like everybody is in the middle.

Judges should be in the business of declaring what the law is using the traditional tools of interpretation, rather than pronouncing the law as they might wish it to be in light of their own political views.

I have never witnessed a concerted effort by any news organization to take a stand one way or the other on a political issue, to damage one particular party or help another.

There is no such thing as a neutral therapist.

We're journalists, and so it's our job to be impartial and provide a fair and thorough assessment of what's happening on the ground from the perspective of what we're able to see.

It is in our power to have no opinion about a thing. - Chapter VI, Verse 52.

Learn to be indifferent to what makes no difference.

Language is not morally neutral because the human brain is not neutral in its desires. Neither is the dog brain. Neither is the bird brain: crows hate owls. We like some things and dislike others, we approve of some things and disapprove of others. Such is the nature of being an organism.

He looked on people, and he neither liked nor disliked them. He looked on life and was neither heartened nor saddened.

Technology is basically neutral. It's kind of like a hammer. The hammer doesn't care whether you use it to build a house, or whether a torturer uses it to crush somebody's skull.

Technology happens, it's not good, it's not bad. Is steel good or bad?

To speak of television as 'neutral' and therefore subject to change is as absurd as speaking of the reform of a technology such as guns.

I agree with Dante, that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality. There comes a time when silence becomes betrayal.

One lesson to learn is that the press and the broadcasters are not neutral. And it seems we have to learn it each time there is a dispute: they are actually committed to one side.

What I aim at is an image with a minimum of information and markers, that has no reference to a given time or place.

There can be no neutrality in a polarized world because there can be no nonpartisan or apolitical institutions.