Quotes About Neutrality

'Network neutrality' is sometimes called 'Internet freedom' or 'Internet openness' and is a legal principle that would forbid cable and phone companies like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast from blocking some websites or providing special priority to others.

I consider myself neither liberal nor conservative when it comes to foreign policy.

I've never been involved in any kind of political movement.

There can be no activist judges from any political party.

I don't want to be identified with any political party.

I don't like politics. I am not aligned to any political party. I have friends in all political parties.

I'm not a controversial person. I'm not trying to polarise people.

I don't like to get involved in controversial things.

The next generation of innovators, who need neutrality the most, are not at the bargaining table. They're hard at work in their labs or classrooms, dreaming of the next big thing, and hoping that the Internet is as open to them as it was to the founders of Google.

When people talked about O.J. Simpson being race-neutral, that was a race card. It just meant we don't think of him as black. But race-neutral is just like flesh-tone Band-aids. It's not neutral; it's white.

Everyone used to call me 'Mr. Switzerland.' I'm not the kind of guy who smack talks anybody or whatever.

If God existed (concerning which Jubal maintained neutrality) and if He wanted to be worshipped (a proposition which Jubal found improbable but nevertheless possible in the light of his own ignorance), then it seemed wildly unlikely that a God potent to shape galaxies would be swayed by the whoop-te-do nonsense the Fosterites offered as "worship." But

Your principle should be to see everything and say nothing. The world changes so rapidly that if you want to get on you cannot afford to align yourself with any person or point of view.

The government must pursue a course of complete neutrality toward religion.

Science is and should be seen as "completely neutral" on the issue of the theistic or atheistic implications of scientific results.

In the relationship between man and religion, the state is firmly committed to a position of neutrality.

The role of the federal government should be neutral toward culture just as it is toward religion.

I wouldn't burden any decent system of faith by participating in it... I'm not agnostic. Just nonpartisan. Theological Switzerland, that's me.

If a State refused to let religious groups use facilities open to others, then it would demonstrate not neutrality but hostility toward religion.

The only ground on which a neutral State can claim respect at the hands of belligerents is, that, so far as she is concerned, their rights are protected.

To emphasize style is to slight content, or to introduce an attitude which is neutral with respect to content.

Silence isn't neutrality; it is supporting the status quo.

Indeed, it is impossible to be neutral. In a world already moving in certain directions, where wealth and power are already distributed in certain ways, neutrality means accepting the way things are now. It is a world of clashing interests -- war against peace, nationalism against internationalism, equality against greed, and democracy against elitism -- and it seems to me both impossible and undesirable to be neutral in those conflicts.

Being neutral is impossible in many cases, because it may mean that you are an accomplice. You can be fair and objective only by giving a listening ear to both parties. And yet your objectivity will still be scruitinized by subjective minds.