Quotes About Interdisciplinary

We have artists with no scientific knowledge and scientists with no artistic knowledge and both with no spiritual sense of gravity at all, and the result is not just bad, it is ghastly.

by the time you finish this book, you'll see that it actually makes no sense to distinguish between aspects of a behavior that are "biological" and those that would be described as, say, "psychological" or "cultural." Utterly intertwined.

Ooh, we're going to think subtly. We won't get suckered into simplistic answers, not like those chicken-crossing-the-road neurochemists and chicken evolutionary biologists and chicken psychoanalysts, all living in their own limited categorical buckets.

This was Hist and Lit, after all. If you couldn't work the term liminal into your tutorial, you were doing it wrong.

Science and art sometimes can touch one another, like two pieces of the jigsaw puzzle which is our human life, and that contact may be made across the boderline between the two respective domains.

Science and art are not opposed.

Chemistry has been termed by the physicist as the messy part of physics, but that is no reason why the physicists should be permitted to make a mess of chemistry when they invade it.

Every kind of science, if it has only reached a certain degree of maturity, automatically becomes a part of mathematics.

With acknowledgement of residues, we can be more easily prepared to grant the unit of science, the overlapping of disciplines, and the total coherence of all facts.

Study the science of art and the art of science.

Anthropologists are a connecting link between poets and scientists; though their field-work among primitive peoples has often made them forget the language of science.

Architecture is a science arising out of many other sciences, and adorned with much and varied learning; by the help of which a judgment is formed of those works which are the result of other arts.

Photography was the medium preeminently qualified to unite art with science. Photography was born in the years which ushered in the scientific age, an offspring of both science and art.

Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics.

besides the comfort of knowlege, every science is auxiliary to every other.

Combinatorialists and analysts always have different names for everything, in order to keep themselves from interacting.

At Shimer we paid no attention to disciplinary boundaries; we blithely followed problems wherever they led. For better or for worse, I've never been able to shake this approach.

My interest in spiritual approaches to medical problems should not, however, be construed as a dismissal of science; rather it is a call for more integrated relations between science and humanities in order to transform medical cultures.

Because of the nature of the profession of architecture, the art of architecture nourishes itself from other disciplines.

I don't see any difference between architecture and engineering. It's the same profession.

Why limit yourself to one discipline or field of study?

I have always felt that it's a little artificial to divide the sciences and the arts on college campuses.

There is no quick technical fix for a social problem.

To develop a complete mind: Study the science of art; Study the art of science. Learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.